My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
440 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0078
>
Land Use
>
14-3658, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2026 2:44:30 PM
Creation date
1/15/2026 2:41:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I MEMORANDUM <br />To: Soren Mattick, City Attorney <br />Melanie Curtis , Planning & Zoning Coordinator <br />From: Mike Gaffron, Asst. City Administrator <br />Date: March 20, 2014 <br />Subject: Interpretation of RS District Code re: Guest Cabins <br />Attachment: <br />A -Zoning Code Sections 78-561 thru 78-578: RS District Standards <br />B -Lot Area Variance Resolutions from 1983 & 1987 and their Intro Letter 2/15 /83 <br />Soren -need your thoughts on deciphering the status of an existing cabin on Big Island. The <br />short version of a long story is that this property has a small 700 s.f. cabin with plumbing and <br />septic . The new owners want to build a larger dwelling near it ( on the same lot) but keep the <br />cabin as a 'guest cabin '. <br />Council <br />Exhibit F <br />The question came up at the PC meeting on Monday as to whether they are allowed to keep the <br />existing plumbing in the small cabin. Our initial take on this was 'no'. Now we think maybe the <br />answer 1s yes . <br />I will work you through my thought process relative to the code . <br />A. Status of the proposed new larger dwelling to be built: <br />Per 78-564(2) it will be a permitted use as a "one-famiiy detached dweHing used for <br />seasonal recreational use not to exceed 180 days in any one year ... " <br />B. Status of existing small cabin (700 s.f.): <br />1. It is a legal non-conforming structure. It is proposed to be used as a 'guest cabin'. <br />Construction of the new larger dwelling changes the status of the existing small cabin <br />from a principal permitted use to an accessory use, right? Therefore, per 78-566(3) if it <br />was less than or equal to 600 s.f. it could be allowed as an accessory private guest cabin <br />without a CUP , but must comply with 78-565(2)f. <br />But, it is larger than 600 s.f., so 78-566(3) does not apply. It cannot be allowed simply as <br />an accessory use ; it 's an accessory use that requires conditional use approval. <br />2. Can it be allowed as a conditional use under 78-565? Applicable section is 78-565(2), <br />Guest Cabins. <br />-The preamble paragraph of 78-565(2) states that one or more such cabins with indoor <br />toilet &/or kitchen located on the same lot as a permitted seasonal dwelling, can be <br />allowed as a conditional use subject to certain Council findings , and subject to a) thru f): <br />a) No rental or lease allowed. 01'.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.