Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ORONO <br />P.O. Box66 <br />ZONING FILE #01-2749 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION <br />ACTION <br />PHONE:(952) 249-4600 FAX:(952) 249-4616 DATE OF NOTICE: February 28, 2002 <br />TO: Thomas Egan <br />1408 Holdridge Circle <br />Wayzata, MN 55391 <br />TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />Subdivision <br />_K_ Other (Right of Way Vacation) <br />DATE OF MEETING: February 19, 2002 VOTE: 6 FOR <br />Planning Commission recommends the following: <br />__ Approval as submitted <br />__ Approval subject to conditions noted below <br />X Denial for reasons noted below <br />Tabled for reasons noted below <br />__ No action required <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />0 AGAINST <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and noted there may be a public value to Massasoit <br />A venue as a potential trail. The cabins located within the right of way restricts public pedestrian use <br />of the corridor. The entire corridor is almost entirely within 75' of the lakeshore. No buildings could <br />replace the cabins when the time comes for the lots to redevelop. The cabins would have to be <br />moved back on the property to meet all current setback requirements. To keep the interests of the <br />public in mind, the Planning Commission noted the right of way may serve a future public use as <br />island as a future trail corridor. <br />Also noted was the potential for one or two public access points to the lakeshore. The survey <br />indicates the existing right of way does not reach the Ordinary High Water Level (929.4') of Lake <br />Minnetonka. Therefore there is no public lake access at the south end of the peninsula. The <br />Planning Commission discussed the option of an exchange ofland for the vacation to acquire enough <br />property to provide public access to the lakeshore. <br />Based on the potential use of the corridor as a public recreational trail, the Planning Commission felt <br />they would like the Park Commission to review the proposal. The applicant stated he did not wish to <br />have the Park Commission review and would prefer to discuss the proposal with the City Council.