My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
330 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0066
>
Land Use
>
01-2690, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2026 1:12:36 PM
Creation date
1/15/2026 1:09:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ROLL <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 16, 2001 <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members present: <br />Chair Elizabeth Hawn, Commissioners William Stoddard, Dale Lindquist, Sandra Smith, <br />Janice Berg, Jeanne Mabusth, and J. Marc Fritzler (alternate). The following represented Cfty Staff: <br />Planning Director Michael Gaffron, Zoning Administrator Paul Weinberger, Zoning Administrator <br />Wendy Bottenberg, and Recorder Lin Vee. <br />Chair Hawn called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#1) #01-2690 JOHN A. EIDEN, 330 BIG ISLAND, AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES, <br />6:31 p.m. -6:40 p.m. <br />John Eiden, Applicant, was present. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weinberger stated the Applicant is requesting an after-the-fact variance to permit replacement of a <br />lakeside deck on Big Island, constituting hardcover and structural coverage within 75' of the <br />lakeshore. The deck is approximately 32' from the lakeshore. According to historical surveys and <br />photos, the deck appears to be of the same size as the original deck. The owner's intention was to <br />repair the deck; however, only the original footings could be used because of extensive deterioration. <br />Another issue, unrelated to the variance request, is that a structure located at the rear of the property <br />is above a platted right-of-way used for pedestrian access or utilities. A previous owner had <br />completed a rehabilitation of the structure in 1991 and was issued a "stop work" order. No further <br />work has been done to that structure and it has no impact on the current variance request. <br />City Staff recommends approval of the after-the-fact variance request for deck replacement within <br />75' of the lakeshore constituting hardcover and structural coverage based on the fact that the deck <br />previously existed, the existing building was located in its current location prior to current zoning <br />standards, and some type of structure is needed to the lakeside of the building for access. <br />Eiden stated that he had eliminated a stairway resulting in less hardcover than the previous deck. He <br />showed a sample of the rotten floor joists to the Commissioners . <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Smith asked if the deck needed to be considered a rebuild rather than a repair. <br />Weinberger responded that since only a couple of posts remained, it was considered new structure. <br />PAGE I
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.