My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Big Island
>
310 Big Island - 23-117-23-32-0073
>
Land Use
>
98-2361, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2026 11:30:43 AM
Creation date
1/15/2026 11:28:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Telephone <br />CITY of ORONO <br />Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 • Municipal Offices <br />May 16, 1983 <br />Mr. Roy E. Ahern <br />6449 Barrie Road <br />On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 <br />Re, Big r.sland~ ~ <br />Dear Mr. Ahern: <br />Enclosed are separate information packets on your two Big Island <br />lots and their status under the revised zoning ordinance adopted <br />last December. <br />I recommend that you consider completing and returning the variance <br />resolution forms (#2) and the lot combination forms (#3) for both <br />of your properties. poing this will ensure that you receive the <br />full grandfather benefits of the ordinance designed to protect <br />building ri9b_:t:s on those properties with existing cabins . .. _,, __ , . .,"'-·---~'-<"---~~"'¾,,,, <br />(RECORD LOT # 15 ~") <br />\, •, ca>.•"''"•·••~·-· . . ..• <br />If ·you'"still have a problem with the record lot designation for <br />Record Lot #15, then you should not return the variance resolution, <br />but should instead return the blue form (#1) and whatever other <br />factual data you believe will support your challenge. <br />I have talked to your realtor, Judy Frommes, concerning these <br />properties and the City's position classifying these six lots as <br />one building site. As I have said to her and previously to you, I <br />believe you have the following options available: <br />1. Accept the City designation and retain all six lots together as <br />one building site. You could rebuild the existing cabin (?) or <br />more likely, replace it with a new cabin located either in the <br />front or to the rear. In this case, I suggest you sign and return <br />the variance resolution to guarantee the automatic/no fee variance. <br />2. You could sell the back lots to another abutting property owner <br />who could then combine them into his property without creating <br />a new building site. In this case, to rebuild the cabin on the <br />front lot, you would have to formally apply for a change in the <br />record lot designation and for a lot area variance, and perhaps for <br />other variances. Such variances would most likely be approved but <br />the burden would be on you to:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.