Laserfiche WebLink
William J. Yaeger <br />July 31, 1997 <br />Page2 <br />the property, is aware of the buildability issues as evidenced by correspondence in City files between <br />the City and Ahem and his attorney. The primary buildability issue is whether Lot 64 should be <br />granted a lot area variance absent legal combination with the 5 additional parcels. <br />A secondary buildability issue is the location of the new structure within Lot 64. Any 'grandfather' <br />rights that may have accrued to the old cabin are no longer valid given that it has been totally <br />removed. It is unlikely that the City Council would grant an after-the-fact lakeshore setback <br />variance for :fue new cabin given that the 'hardship' is entirely self-created. <br />A violation citation is enclosed requiring you to appear in court. It is the City's intent that the <br />offending structure be removed. If it is not removed by September 1, further legal action will be <br />taken. However, if you wish to apply for a lot area variance and would consider moving the cabin <br />to a conforming location if a lot area variance is granted, then there may be a basis for delaying <br />removal. To discuss any of the issues outlined in this letter, please feel free to contact me at 473- <br />7357. <br />Michael P. Gaffron <br />Senior Planning. Coordinator <br />encl. <br />cc: Bruce Vang, Field Inspector <br />Lyle Oman, Building Official <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />Desyl Peterson, Prosecuting Attorney <br />Thomas Barrett, City Attorney <br />RoyE.Ahem