Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#2361 -Yaeger June 11, 1998 Page 5 Issues for Discussion 1. Should Lot 64 be designated as an individual Record Lot separate from Lots 65-8-9-10-11? 2. If so, should the after-the-fact variances be granted to allow the new cabin and gazebo to remain in their non-conforming locations? Options for Consideration ISSUE 1 -Record Lot Status A. Recommend denial of the lot area and width variance, concluding that Record Lot # 15 must consist of all 6 separate tax parcels. [Implications: Lot 64 remains unbuildable, and it follows that the cabin and gazebo constructed without permits must be removed] OR B. Recommend approval of the lot area and width variance, concluding that Record Lot #15 should be separated into two individual record lots (#15A and #15B). [Implications: Lot 64 gains Record Lot status and the variances for cabin and gazebo construction can be reviewed on their own merits] OR C. Recommend approval of a lot width and area variance conditioned on applicant acquiring some specified additional adjacent ( or non-adjacent?) land for combination ( or special lot combination?) with Lot 64. [Implications: Lot 64 remains unbuildable unless/until additional land is added to it; cabin and gazebo variances remain in limbo for a limited time until applicant can acquire additional land] OR D. Other, or some combination of the above. ISSUE 2 -Cabin and Gazebo Variances A. Recommend that the new cabin and gazebo be relocated to meet 75' lakeshore setback and 1 O' side setbacks, which would eliminate the hardcover variance; and that the cabin be provided with a continuous enclosed approved foundation to frost level. OR B. Recommend that the new cabin and gazebo be allowed to remain in place, that lake setback, side setback and 0-75' hardcover variances be granted (specifically define the hardships that support such a position) but require that the cabin be provided with continuous enclosed approved foundation to frost level. OR