Laserfiche WebLink
#2549 <br />220 Big Island -Dock Request <br />Page 5 <br />Staff Recommendation <br />It has been staffs intent to not only reach a conclusion on the Lovelace request but to provide some <br />direction for future access requests. Based on our review of the access sites, the topographic and <br />other limitations of each site, and the locations of the inland lots which may request access in the <br />future, staff recommends as follows: <br />1. Inland parcels 1 and 2 (Scheftel, Lovelace) should be allowed dock access at Access C. <br />2. Inland parcel 3 should continue to be allowed a dock access at Access D. <br />3. Inland parcels 4 thru 8 should be assigned future access at Access D if they request it, subject <br />to LMCD regulations. <br />4. Inland parcel 9 could be served by a dock at either Access Dor Access E; Eis closer but <br />presents more topographic difficulties. <br />5. Accesses A, B, F, G, and H do not readily lend themselves to providing dock access to inland <br />lots and should therefore remain dock-free. <br />6. Access H has a recent severe erosion problem which needs to be addressed, and may result <br />in gating or closure of that access by the City for all but emergency and incidental service <br />vehicle uses. <br />I have also included a draft version of the proposed Comprehensive Plan language discussing Big <br />Island for your review -it may add to your understanding of Big Island issues. <br />Options for Action <br />1. Recommend approval per staff recommendation. <br />2. Recommend denial, stating reasons. <br />3. Recommend something other than staff recommendation. <br />4. Table for further information.