My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
09-22-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2026 2:06:15 PM
Creation date
1/12/2026 1:58:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Despite the above Lr.regularities and violations, the septic system was <br />approved. Obviously, the City of Orono therefore bears at least some <br />responsibility for the condition of my septic system and my current plight, <br />yet, as current owner of the property, I am the one held accountable. <br />Basis the City's failure to approve my septir. cyst ,. have lost the ability <br />to refinance rm. iuse. This has already cost me approximately 4350.00 in <br />unrecoverable appraisal fees, credit reports, water tests, etc., and could <br />potentially cost me approximately $50,000 3150 per no. x 30 years savings) if <br />I am unable to refinance at the advantageous interest rates that were <br />available earlier this year. <br />Additionally, within two creeks after receipt of the "bombshell" inspection <br />report, my finished, carpeted basement was flooded not once but twice by <br />back-up of the septic systeo. Our damages amounted to well over $600 (none of <br />which was covered by insurance), and included many hours of disgusting <br />clean-up and trauma ti) my family. <br />Subsequent to receipt of the City Inspection Report, I have contacted a number <br />of contractors to obtain cost estimates relative to repair/replacement of my <br />system basis City recommendations. To fully remedy the situation, via <br />uncovering Fnd waterl -)fing the existing tanks, adding risers and manholes, <br />installation - high water alarm, installation of the proper pump, and <br />replacement ui ,e existing drain field with a mound system (as indicated on <br />page 6 of the inspection report) would cost approximately $5800 at minimum, <br />excluding repairs to my lawn. This is completely beyond our financial means. <br />This proposal would also result in the los_. of usable lawn space and possible <br />loss o trees. <br />As in'.tially indicated, - am requesting that we be permitted to onnect o the <br />urist.ng City sewer in Lane, a:: an alternative to repair/reply ement of my <br />on •+te septic system. e Elm Lane sewer line is directly Ijacent to my <br />pr nerty ants is only abo,it 220 ft. from the sewer discharge a of my house. <br />C ntractor estimates indicate that approximately C. 00 wouli co-- r all costs <br />necessary to complete this hook-up. Although thi- sum of mor? 's also more <br />than we can currently rfford, it is at least financially feL <br />At present we have a home that cannot be reLinanced, cannot ue -+ld, and <br />cannot be left unattended without fear that the septic system may again erupt <br />in our basement during our absence. Currently we are unable to ccrrect this <br />situation as we lark the finance:; required to COMDlete the extensive <br />repair/replacement work proposed by the City. We therefore ask your <br />assistance in resolution of this problem, and that our alternate proposal be <br />ari,- -)ved. <br />%k, ) �[V,0 <br />Toward W. Hul- <br />2445 Woodhaven Drive <br />Long Lake, MN 55356 <br />cc: Jeanne Mabusth <br />Building and Zoning Administrator <br />Orono City Offices <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />r 2693F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.