My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
09-22-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2026 2:06:15 PM
Creation date
1/12/2026 1:58:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1059 <br />September 17, 1986 <br />Page 7 <br />The majority of the Planning Commission voted denial of the <br />conditional use permit (for duplex use) (originally accepted by <br />staff as a ossible continuation of a non -conforming use - deemed <br />less in*:nse of a use than the previous mixed <br />commercial/residential. uses). A review of the records on this <br />property revealed no evidence to support a position that the <br />duplex use was deemed less intense than the mixed <br />commercial/residential. Tt,e majority opinion felt each permit by <br />the City issued to the applicant clearly advised the second <br />apartment was for non -rental use although a conditional use <br />permit for the non -rental apartment was never required in 1976. <br />Pleas r review Exhibit A, the minutes that contain the specific <br />recommend, c.ion of the Planning Commission. <br />Alternxti4va of Council Action: <br />A) To deny the Bjork application fc:- a conditional use <br />permit for duplex credit and to gra- a conditional use <br />permit for a non -rental apartment unit subject to the <br />following conditions: <br />1. The owner working with both the Hennepin County <br />Highway Department and the Orono staff in establishing <br />a permanent, safe curb cut to the site; <br />2. Removal of detached accessory st. ture in rear <br />yard that is in a state of disrepair. <br />Direct staff to draft a resolution with appropriau, Findings <br />for actio: t your meeting of October 13th. <br />B) To direct btaff to draft a resolution of approval for a <br />conditional use permit for a duplex based on resolve of the <br />following issues: <br />1. City Attorney to opine if granting a duplex credit <br />for this proper,- constitutes a use variance or merely <br />a var i anc,: to erformance stai.dard of Section 10.20, <br />Sub ision 3 ti) - If this is considered a use <br />var e - the application will be retur �d for further <br />Councii action at your October 13th meeting. <br />2. Building Department to evaluate existing structure <br />in regard to building code standards for legal duplex. <br />a) need for indepent water meters; <br />b) separate hook-ups t^ sewer for each units: <br />c) second floor_ apartment must be brought upto <br />building cc>de standards; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.