My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
09-22-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2026 2:06:15 PM
Creation date
1/12/2026 1:58:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning Fi-e #lL- :O <br />August 13, 1986 <br />Page 5 <br />'f Plan.,ing Commi:-:;ior finds that property qualifies for <br />dui ex credit, you may consider the following findings: <br />1. roperty was assessed for 2 residential seer and 2 <br />residential water units. <br />2. Second floor ai,artmen area created prior to zoning and <br />building standards (allowed 1- 4.::t,d reside tial and commercial <br />use). <br />3. Property has immediate• access to County Road. <br />4. External appearance-,s of house suggest single family <br />residential use. <br />5. There is adequate room on site for of et parkinq. <br />If Planting C'ommissioi: fi.nc.. the !. L-erty :s not qualify <br />,.or duplex credit, may consider the tollowing findir-1s: <br />1. Property i= not adjacent to commercial district but <br />ace jFacent to a c ,; ally used property considered a legal <br />non -conforming The objective behind all zoning, <br />standards for n4 :f( its uses is that the use fade away <br />and permitted and confc uses within specific zoning <br />district be establishec:. <br />2. T;,e prc -'_y is -e eta ly substandard - property lacks <br />14,456 s.f area, house encroaches rirgil-of—avay <br />eC- ems!? 1 a 1" d~,,..c.. <br />3. Saf ;..,fen more of a conrern with increased or <br />inten*...e^ -,ronerty. Accesses to and from property <br />increas:_ <br />4. Pe,•mi ._s for guest apartment clearly advised applicant <br />that unit could never be used for rental purposes. <br />Such use %uuld be in conflict with the intent and <br />urpcse of the LR-lC Zoning ristrict. <br />Cther ib6ues to be resolved concerning this prcT*r+y: <br />1. ' sf ine ai. ~ i e.d curl, gilt to pry rt - e; Hennepin <br />C., my Highwa. )epar+* nt approval - )vn ac, -;s to site <br />m- ,t b- discontirued - only ore approv•ad access to and from <br />site; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.