My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
09-08-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2026 12:03:25 PM
Creation date
1/12/2026 11:57:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Marty Bethke, contractor for applicant, stated that for <br />the record in response to Mr. McKinnon's suggestion to <br />change the roofline, it would not be a practical <br />sollution because it would then create a problem in <br />maximum height code restrictions. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded by Acting <br />Mayor Adams, to table this application until the <br />September 8th Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />#1026 !MIKE HILBELINK/JOHN VOGT <br />1060 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />RESOLUTION #2035 <br />Mike Hilbelink and John Vcgt were present for this <br />matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated that following the <br />last Council meeting in which Council made a motion <br />regarding access on this preliminary subdivision <br />applicaticn, applicants have come back with an <br />alternative road design for the Council to re -consider. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the applicants <br />proposal for a 50' access corrdior located on the east <br />side to be shared by Lots 2 & 3 based on the following: <br />1) assure ability to have both houses face west with <br />walk -outs to the rear. <br />2) reduce number of curb cuts from 2 to 1. <br />3) reduce road construction costs. <br />Mabusth noted that the corridor would serve future <br />subdivision development of the Hallson Estate. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson stated at this proposal <br />would avoid the issue of a north/sough corridor to the <br />boundary line and also would be advantageous to the <br />Hallson Fs,�ated because of the cost of another road <br />being put in and also would provide more useable land <br />credit. <br />Mr. Hilbelink presented a signed letter from Mrs. Grace <br />Rosch stating she is not in favor of giving up any <br />property on her east lot line for a road. <br />Council discussed applicants alternative and felt it <br />would solve the issues of access and minimizing curb <br />cuts for future development of the adjacent parcels <br />of properties. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Frahm, seconded by <br />Councilmember Grabek, to adopt R olution #2035 <br />approving the preliminary subdivision designating a 50' <br />wide corridor in the east side of Lots 2 and 3 for a <br />shared access to those lots; and noting Council's intent <br />that this corridor will serve the Hallson Estate <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.