My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-08-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
09-08-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2026 12:03:25 PM
Creation date
1/12/2026 11:57:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 18, 1986 <br />#1064 CITY OF ORONO CONTINUED <br />questionably legal because the operation did interrupt <br />for morn. Lhan 12 months after it became a legal non- <br />conforming use. He stated that is a bad use of the <br />property that has not been operated according to its <br />conditional use permit and the City has consistently <br />refused to force the operator to correct the problems. <br />He submits that the appropriate answer to the lif4. <br />station would have been for the City to condemn the <br />entire property because the yard cannot be reduced in a <br />substandard lot, to tear down gas station and remove all <br />that hardcover, and place the lift station more than 50' <br />from the Crear residence and other properties. He <br />stated that every lift station that does not meet the <br />code conditions should be subject to an apr ication and <br />should be denied or granted on its own j:its, not <br />because its already there noting that the . :y issue of <br />replacement is financial which is not a valid hardship. <br />He further stated that he felt the process in which the <br />City followed in placement of the lift station was <br />deceptive and not in the open. <br />Dan Crear, 1 80 Spates Ave., stated that the City has <br />been negligent in notifying him regarding the placement <br />of the lift station and other matters such as the recent <br />blacktop on his pro_ ty to solve a drainage problem. <br />He stated that the lift station was so visibly close <br />(15' from property line, 40' from house) to his house <br />ar .nterferes with his alread, limited view of the lake <br />and that he is oLIposed to any more decoration of the <br />lift station. He noted that ;he sewer and lift station <br />issue has affected him considerably because he is not <br />able to sell his house for a reasonable amount in <br />addition to problems involving the actual hookup from <br />his house to sewer. <br />LaDean McWilliams, 1130 Willow Drive, noted that it <br />costs the crystal Bay residents an additional $5^0 to <br />change tr location of the lift station from Rovegno's <br />property to the present location, and that the City <br />approved this without a public hearing. <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />McDonald asked if as possible to relocate the ' ift <br />station up on the office property. <br />Consulting Engineer Mike Lynch stated it would require <br />another lift station noting issues of the extreme depth <br />of the existing gravity sewer. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.