Laserfiche WebLink
TES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 21, 1986 <br />11048/#1049 ASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC, INC. <br />2605 'A BOULEVARD <br />COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN/VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:30 - 8:57 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Representing Washington Scientific were Joe Pollansch <br />and Mike Unger. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for a <br />variance to the exterior materials uses in an accessory <br />structure and a conditional use permit for an accessory <br />structure in an industrial zone. The purpose .of the <br />accessory building is to store metal scrap waste <br />materials and some chemicals (chemicals that must be <br />stored outside the principal building). <br />Goetten voiced concern regarding the type of chemicals <br />and requested a list of chemicals that are to be stored <br />in the structure. <br />Mr. Pollansch stated they would be willing to submit a <br />copy of t.Ne list of materials that they submit to the <br />fire department and MPCA, some of which are chlorinated <br />solvents, hydrogen, and acetone. <br />Regarding the sprinkler system in the principal <br />building, Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that they <br />hope to get an agreement with W.S.I. indicating when <br />sprinkling of the structure will be completed, clearly, <br />the proposed accessory structure will have to be <br />sprinkled at construction time. <br />Callahan noted that in addition to the above stated <br />variance and conditional use permit required, the <br />applicant needs to be granted a variance to the Hwy. 12 <br />Moratorium Corrdior Study. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that was a good point <br />and explained the moratorium to the applicants noting <br />that staff had failed to review this with the applicant. <br />Chairman Kelley noted that in the Hwy. 12 Corridor study <br />there has been some discussion regarding a service road <br />on their property. <br />Bellows asked why they were proposing a separate <br />structure rather than adding on to the existing <br />building. stated that she felt the applicants were <br />proposing _parate structure in order to avoid/delay <br />updating (sprinkling) the main building. <br />9 <br />