Laserfiche WebLink
Oul.! <br />TO: Mayor r atler %U •1z# Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator �Iy <br />Orono Council Members.] <br />FROM: Orono <br />A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator <br />DATE: August 21, 1986 <br />&OHJ: #1026 M. Hilbelink/J. Vogt, 1060 Old Crystal Bay Road - <br />Preliminary Subdivision - Resolution - Request by applicant to <br />reopen preliminary subdivision review. <br />Review enclosed request by applicants. The final resolution of <br />the access issue by Council at your August llth meeting was as <br />follows: <br />1. Do away with flag lot - Lot I was to grant an access easement <br />in favor of Lot 2 for private driveway purposes over northern <br />portion of Lot 1. <br />2. Access of Lot 3 was to be off Watertown subject to staff <br />approval. <br />3. 25 foot wide outlot to be platted along west lot lines of <br />Lots 2 and 3 up to southeast corner of Lot 1. <br />4. Any future subdivision of Lots 2 and 3 may create the need <br />for a private road which must be built per City specifications. <br />5. City finds no need for a north/south road commitment at this <br />time. <br />The applicants claim this would result in a waste of money and <br />duplication of efforts in requiring the installations of 2 major <br />driveways that would have to be removed at the time of a later <br />subdivision. <br />They now ask that you approve a shared access to Lots 2 and 3 via <br />a shared driveway on east side (review applicant's :ketch) based on <br />the following: <br />1. assure abi lity to have both houses face west with walk -outs <br />to the rear; <br />2. reduce number of curb cuts f-om 2 to 1- <br />3. reduce road construction costs. <br />The current sketch plan does not show e platted outlot but rather <br />what appears a shared driveway via easements. Applicants have advised <br />staff that they planned to designate a 50 foot wide road outlot with <br />100 foot cul-de-sac at-d no easements to north property line because of <br />Council's descisi.on on the north/south through road. It is not clear <br />from sketch and applicants previous discussions with staff hew <br />applicant wishes to proceed. <br />