Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT,.c OF THE PLANNING COT:7'oSION MEETING HELD JUNE 16, 1986 <br />�*1010 WILLIAA ULRICH CONT. <br />McDonald stated ti,it by installing the sea wall it <br />merely moveL the muskrats down the shoreline and noted <br />that a sea wall would never be approved on the main <br />lakeshore. <br />Callahan stated that 1,e felt there was no end to t-ae <br />Ulrich plans and requests. He would like to see an <br />entire plan for both properties to Ye considered. <br />John. Noble stated that he is unaware of any more future <br />plans for the Bloborn property, but he really cannot <br />speak on behalf of Mr. Ulrich. <br />Goetten agreed with Callahan regarding seeing an entire <br />plan. <br />Th,re were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Rovegno, seconded by Kelley, to <br />recommend approval of the southern lagoon sea wall <br />request subject to conditions and findings noted in <br />Resolution i1522 approved for the northern lagoon sea <br />wall, and noting that no sea wall would be approved on <br />the main lakeshore. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 1. Goetten <br />voted nay. <br />1001 THOWAS J. MAXWELL <br />3665 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9:32 - 9:50 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Present representing Mr. Maxwell was John Ebert of Ebert <br />Construction ani qupply. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that <br />this application was originally intended as a setback <br />variance application to construct or enlarge an existing <br />horse barn. After the survey was submitted, it <br />indicated that the existing barn was partially located <br />upon t:ie property of Mr. Maxwell's aunt, Arlie Thorpe. <br />In order to resolve this problem, Arlie Thorpe planned <br />to deed he land to Mr. Maxwell so he could combine the <br />properties, granting her a life estate. This would <br />present the problem of two houses on one 10.21 acre <br />parcel, which would require a conditional use permit for <br />use of the second house as a guest house. <br />