My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
07-28-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2026 10:00:35 AM
Creation date
1/9/2026 9:55:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.24, SUBDIVISION 5 (B) <br />FILE #1043 <br />WHEREAS, Gary Beito (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of <br />the property located at 1169 North Shore Drive within the City of Orono <br />(hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 17 and 36, and the North h of Lot 37, Skarp and Lindquist's <br />Fernhill, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br />Munir .pal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdi ision 5 (B) to permit the <br />construction of an attached screen porch which will be located 7 feet from <br />a side lot line where a side yard setback of 10 feet is normally required. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED t- City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS⢠<br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1043. <br />The property is located in the LR-lB Single Family Lakeshore <br />-ntial Zoning District. <br />3. Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July <br />t, , and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon <br />the . ilowing findings: <br />Al The proposed addition continues the existing i the <br />t rise. <br />B) The proposed addition has no visual effect on neighbor's <br />views, or light or air. <br />4. Construction of this addition by the applicant's contractor was <br />commenced w-'iout a building permit. <br />5. The City Council has considered this application including the <br />findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br />City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.