Laserfiche WebLink
July 23,1986 <br />Re: Subdivision Peterman Farm <br />a <br />7o: Planning Members and Staff <br />Dear Orono Representative, <br />After receiving preliminary approval of our <br />subdivision from the planning commission, we want to <br />re -submit our feelings concerning this property. <br />We want to ma{:e sure that everyone understariris that <br />there are two separate buyers purchasing this property, <br />and not just one. In their approval, the planning <br />commission is placing a proposed road on speculation of <br />some future developement. As was brought out at the <br />meetinq there are a number of things that could happen <br />to the corner parcel that would greatly alter how that <br />property would be divided. (i.e. Buyers of lot 01 <br />purchasing additional land for pasture.) We have a very <br />hard time understanding why vie should give up property <br />to help the possible developement of adjoining property <br />owners when the entire, future road can be constructed <br />otr their own land. <br />As vie mentioned before, it is our desire to enter <br />lot #3 on the east border for a west facing home that <br />wi 1 1 vial {: out to the rear. 1he Buyer's of lot #2 desire <br />to enter- their proerty as shov:n on the survey, so that <br />they can build a south-facirig home. We are both deeply <br />concerned about being forced to provide or build R road <br />beCaUge sunieorie elses future plans. It would seem to <br />its, that this could be better addressed, at a later <br />time, if and when an application is made to develope <br />this property. We hope you will give this serious <br />caiisider-ation. Thank: you very much. <br />$incerelyrr <br />L` <br />/Mike and Ann <br />HiIbelink <br />/ John and Maureen <br />Vogt <br />