Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Statute ubd. 2a clearly states that the <br />scope of a municipality's buodivi;ion control powers includes the <br />ability to set standards and requirements addressing, among other <br />things, size, location, grading, improvement of lots, structures, <br />public at,:�as, streets, roads, trails, curbs, walkways, anu the <br />protection and conservation of flood plains, shore lands, soils <br />and water. Finally, the statute states that the subdivision <br />regulations shall require that the subdivisions be consistent with <br />the municipality's official map and zoning ordinances. <br />Chapter 11 of the Orono City Code sets forth the City's <br />subdivision policy and regulations. The language container n <br />Section 11.02 articulates the City's policy ari purpose for <br />subdivision regulations, mirroring to a large tent the <br />objectives and policy statement set forth in Minnesota Statute <br />§462.358. The City's regulations emphasize the need for <br />consistency between the City's Comprehensive Plan, sound, orderly <br />development and the need to provide for the public health, safety <br />and general welfare. Against this framework the answers to the <br />three questions outlined above are as follows: <br />1. The City can require that more than minimal zoning and <br />subdivision regulations be met before approving a <br />subdivision application. Minnesota Statutes, and <br />Section 11.02, Suhd. 9 of the City Code clearly <br />recognize the City's ability to attach reasonable <br />conditions to the subdivision of land. The conditions <br />must not be ar.itrary and should promote the general <br />purposes upon which the subdivision regulations are <br />based. For example, if a particular proposed access <br />presents traffic hazards, a danger to the general <br />welfare, or is not consistent with future development <br />plans, the City can require that an alternative access <br />be used. Obviously, personal taste cannot be a guiding <br />factor as the regulations must be related t the scope <br />of the powers granted to the municipalities by the <br />legislature. <br />2. Nothing in statute or the City Code prohibits the City <br />from granting an applicant more variances than <br />originally requested. Section 11.02, Subd. 10 of the <br />City Code outlines the conditions upon which a variance <br />may be granted by the City in the instance of a <br />subdivision recuest. Subdivision variances may be <br />granted if ex'taordinary hardship or practical <br />difficultie. ould result from the strict enforcement <br />of subdivision regulations, and if the variance would <br />in fact serve the purposes of Chapter 11 to a greater <br />extent. Variances cannot be ,ranted if such a variance <br />would: <br />a. Vary t - provisions of the Comprehensive municipal <br />Plan. <br />-2- <br />