My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
07-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 2:03:15 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 1:54:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
( #J• - / L 'I-r - L !!A - L - (-77, <br />should have recommended future accesses in this <br />preliminary sure-'; vision. <br />.ity. Attorney Blatz stated that futur: accesses is one <br />of the issues in granting approval of a preliminary <br />subdivision and should be done before approval of such. ! <br />Cour..:ilmember Frahm stated he felt uncomfortable <br />..-)proving this preliminary subdivision without <br />determining future accesses. <br />Mike Hilbelink stated that the proposed subdivision met <br />all the requirements as submitted and felt that future <br />accesses should be addressed when/if future subdivision <br />occurs. <br />Councilmember Adams stated t.ha4,. this is the point <br />(preliminary si. 'ivision p3 K in which the City <br />at ;ul res its eas-- gilts. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Grabek, seconded b <br />Councilmember Adams, to refer this application back t <br />Planning Commission for their consideration of futurel <br />road acces-%^s to the property involved. Motion, Ayes 1,+ <br />Nay- J <br />#1033 ROIAL DOSSSTT <br />2798 PHEASANT RQAD <br />'6ARIMC <br />RESOLUTION <br />��•�1 Dossett was prese - ` for the s matter. <br />City 3ministrator explained the request to consrr.ul- . <br />pore! and deck which requires hardcover variances W:. <br />.in <br />both 0-75' and 75-2501 setback zones and also <br />r.nd <br />average setback variance - <br />Assistant Zoning Admini,. :ator Gaffron explained <br />the <br />Planning Commission's ;:ommenda 4 on to app -ove <br />the <br />screen porch and a portion of the patio, not approve <br />the <br />sidewalk and deck leading to the side door. ...: noted <br />that the two adjacent neighbors approve of the proposal <br />and cannot see the proposed addition becuase of <br />the <br />trees. <br />Councilmember Frahm state' that ±:-3 :isitp,' the site <br />and <br />::tated be had cc 3rns about the drair .c _ tc the lake <br />because cif the high ;t -•ep slope. <br />Councilmember Adams stated he visited the site also <br />and <br />agreed with Councilmember Frah. <br />Mr. Drissett staved that he would control tr.- drainage <br />fro- he screen porch area so it dr tns away from <br />the <br />lake, but obviously cannot control the drainage from <br />tho <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.