Laserfiche WebLink
C, X tl I Q_ <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD APRIL 21, 1986 <br />#1021 JAN & NORA ACKERBERG <br />4075 HIGHWOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 12:32 - 12:35 A.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Nora Ackerberg was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />request to add hardcover with concurrent hardcover <br />removal all within the 75-250' setback zone. <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />Chairman Kelley stated he found no problem with this <br />request, and felt that he would rather grant the <br />additional hardcover (gravel over plastic) near the <br />house so no basement water problems would result. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Rovegno, to <br />recommend approval of the hardcover variance increase of <br />approximately 150 s.f. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />COOO#1022S A. SCHALL <br />,C <br />605 PARR LANE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 12:35 - 1:01 A.M. <br />The Affidavit of <br />was noted. <br />Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />Mr. & Mrs. Charles Schall were present for this matter <br />along with their builder, Marty Bethke. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron exilu.ned the <br />request for hardcover and setback variances to construct <br />a new attached garage, 2nd story room and entryway. The <br />proposed 221x22' garage will be 7.7' from the north lot <br />line, and about 3.5' from the street. Existing hardcover <br />in the 75-250' zone is 48.8% and would increase 8.6% <br />with the proposed addition, however with the potential <br />of 9.0% in hardcover removals there would be a net <br />decrease in overall hardcover. He pointed out the areas <br />in which could be removed as hardcover. <br />Bellows stated because of the concurrent hardcover <br />removal that hardcover is not a major issue. She <br />stated that she felt the a:-cess to the garage as <br />proposed would be extremely difficult. In addition, she <br />felt there was ro hardship involved in needing the <br />second story room above the garage which would affect <br />the adjacent neighbor by shading their deck. <br />16 <br />