My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
07-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 2:03:15 PM
Creation date
1/6/2026 1:54:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MACKINNON, STANDKE & GREENE, LTD. <br />LAW nFFICES <br />1 771 7 HIGHWAY 7 <br />MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55345 <br />DAME S D MAC:K INNON <br />RDEYERT A STANDKE <br />MARM: E GREENE <br />DANIEI El GREENSTEIN <br />ERICC ❑AMMEYER <br />June 19, 1986 <br />Mayor and Council Members <br />City of Orono <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br />Re: Application 11o. 1022 <br />Charles A. Schall <br />AREA CODE G12 <br />F LE, Pk�ONE47.1322i <br />Our offices represent Stan and Betty Rudd with respect to the <br />above application. In your review of the variance request, I <br />would like you to consider two things. <br />First, if you have been able to take the time to visit the site, <br />I think you will realize that in this area of Orono the houses <br />are very close together. Immediately to the north of the Rudds' <br />house there is a very high, shear wall and building, and the <br />Schalls' proposal would create a similar structure immediately o <br />the south. The net effect would be to close the Rudd property in <br />to the extent that they would feel more like they were living in <br />a townhouse than on a lake lot. It is effects ich as this that I <br />believe you are: to consider when you are balancing the supposed <br />"hardship" of an applicant against the invasion of the rights of <br />the neighbors. <br />Secondly, I would like to point out to you that I do not think <br />that the Council has the legal authority to grant the application <br />as presented. It is my understanding that in order tv grant the <br />request, you need to find a bonafide hardship. I understand that <br />it is commonly held that every house deserves a garage and in <br />this day and age it is reasonable to provide, where possible, <br />that a house would have a two -car garage. In this case, the need <br />fir the garage and its practical location pr3bably do provide a <br />bonafide hardship fo- the construction of a garage, but the <br />hardship clearly ends there. <br />There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that there is any <br />hardship with respect to the desire to builx a bedroom above the <br />garage. The Schalls have stated variously that they would like an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.