My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
06-23-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2026 11:06:38 AM
Creation date
1/6/2026 10:59:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Orono Counc=' Members <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assir nt Zoning Administrator <br />Date: June 5, 1986 <br />s..Ibject: #1022, Char.le shall, 605 Park Lane <br />- Variance - R,.. . t.ion <br />List of Exhibits <br />A- Final Proposal As Recommended For Approval by Planni►;g <br />Commission <br />B- Planning Commission Minutes 5/19/86 <br />C- Planning Commission Minutes 4/21/86 <br />D- Memo to Planning Commission nested 5/16/86 <br />E- ,xhibits to Planning ..ommission Dated 4/16/86 <br />Please <br />review the memos, exhibits, and <br />m.nutes attached. <br />Bri.:r ly, the <br />applicar,t:s wish <br />to replace their <br />existing 1-car en.d- <br />loadin^ garage with a 2-car s. <br />lclding garage <br />with a room above it <br />to be Lsed as <br />a second bedroom <br />and for s ` .,.age space. They also wish <br />to c ►struct <br />a new entryway on <br />tae souti side of <br />the house. <br />During the Planning Corr i ssion review of this applicatir , the <br />neighbor to the immediate no �, objected to the height of the proposed <br />addition because it would ..it sunlight to Lheir deck above the <br />garage, and would create a cl id,in" fe^. ng. A r.r.view of the <br />neighbors deck area by staff cjLid not substantiate that sunlight. <br />would be sc -e: ened y the additicn, a ] though staff did recognize that <br />the addition will change hr ?ercei ved "openness-" of the neighboring <br />p,,,.perty. <br />The applicants and nFighb r5 -spent a month review; .ig possible <br />revisions of the proposal which would be acceptable to both vartiEs. <br />No comrromise was reach J. Plann' Com-•;ssion at their 5/19/86 <br />meeting acted upon the original appli '.ores voting 4-2 to ar)nrove the <br />original garage proposal as submit+-ed• with a revised ry plan <br />moving it further west to avoi ] -he existing well, wit'. current <br />removal of the front sid^walk �no lakes )re. yard :r ,ckbed hardcover, <br />but allowing them to maintain '-ne r ,tiro existing drivciyay hardcc�, �.,._ r <br />as a backup apron. <br />SAC L�-L7 Ji�titf '�v=�� f n.!^i AI- +7 �1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.