Laserfiche WebLink
'Zoning -Pile #1932 <br />JLne 4; 198(, <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />3. The request to sewer would .;t be contrary to the <br />Comprehensive roman as the City has r.eccntly sewered other severly <br />limited rural defined areas with sewer and such a reques� can be <br />included in a comprehensive amendment of the M.U.S.A. Line. <br />Staff has drafted an approving resolution per the 'irect'_ves of <br />the Planking Commission recommendation. <br />Mr. Fulmer, in a rece- visit to the City offices, submitted an <br />updated survey of his property enclosed for your review. fie reminded <br />stafc that Rusol:<rion No. 1654 granting a conditional use permit for <br />the expansion of the kennel had expired. The resolution does no <br />specify a deadl' - date but Serti. r, .09, Subdivision 8 does statt <br />.at permits ar. /- lid for orit- y In addition, if a renewal is <br />needed that renew 1 must be prier to the deadline - in this <br />case August 1985. Fulmer re;rnin-qed staff t1n7?t the planni tu,'-• was <br />to commence in September of that year and soon after the at <br />Ful,ner seeks Council. direction regarding the following cc .. <br />11 Council cxtend the expiration date of his conditional <br />mit or .nust he file a new conditional use permit? <br />Does the r ratni u,n have any affect on building permits <br />.sued for comme;cia1 es approved under a valid conditional use <br />permit? <br />'c. Enclosures <br />..esolution #1654 <br />Survey Dated 4/30/P6 <br />