Laserfiche WebLink
C) There is no other location on the property in which to <br />construct a 2-car garage due to the required 10 foot <br />separation between structures and the close proximity of the <br />house to the south, which is only 0.5 feet from the lot <br />line. <br />D) The Orono Zoning* Code grants no specific view or sun- <br />light rights to the neighboring property owners as regards <br />the street yard of their property. <br />E) The 2nd-story room over the garage is reasonable <br />considering the small size of the lot, and is preferable to <br />a horizontal expansion of the house which would create <br />additional hardcover. <br />F) The applicant has rit-ised the entryway proposal to meet <br />the wel' setback requirements. <br />G) For safety purposes it is real fable to allow the <br />applicant to keep the entire existing paved parking apron in <br />order to provide a backup area to avoid backing out into the <br />street. <br />H) No other land is available for ap, ...ant to purchase in <br />order to make his property more conforming. <br />I) There is existing hardcover in the 0-75' and 75-250' <br />setback zones which can be removed to partially offset the <br />proposed additional hardcover. <br />ecz.use one of the general purposes of sideyard setback and <br />requirements in the Zoning Code is to maximize the amount <br />c, n space, air, and sunlight in a neighborhood, it is <br />al. iate to restrict the height of this garage addition, given <br />ht -.setback variance allowed. <br />5. The City Council has considered this application includin <br />the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commissic;: <br />report by City staff, comments by the applicant and comments; 1 <br />the put Lic, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br />health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing .in thiec <br />property are peculiar to it and Oo not apply generally to other <br />proper—, in this zoning district; tt.c granting the variance <br />would not at rsely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire 1 r.ard or other danger to neighboring property; would <br />not merely serve as a convenience to the applicai—, but is <br />necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br />necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br />applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the Cit3. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />