My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
06-09-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2026 2:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/5/2026 2:16:57 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. Although raising large amounit:, of money for the pe;rk;occ :rf <br />improving the park: was not contemp 1 •ate 6 in tho will, Dennett i <br />against it as it could re:.,ul t in a cha e of character in the park. <br />Gray summarized this section by stinting that the will clearly <br />i ntendod Nourenberg Park to be ca .Although well -kept place to <br />visit. <br />Comment m on th, interpretation ai the will centered cin whE�4' -ar <br />f and i nu for the perk: _as i nd i catud in the will would be enaugh <br />provide -for a well -maintained park:. OLOeStinns included: <br />Could county funds be !iS0171^ Couid basic fc-r.ci1it-ies Zuch I�B is <br />parking lot or restrooms be constructed from the earnings'' Jeasen <br />stated that earnings could be 31 '4,000/year. Operating E" nse s <br />in 1905 total A77, 000. <br />Is the interpretation too narrow'? Glen Ray stated that Dennett's <br />interpretation of the will sec:,med to be in conflict with th <br />interpretation of the ,-original committee. !art+y Suggested that <br />further efforts r interpr-etat.ir:rn be investigated. lip requested <br />that members of the committee take- time to review the will and <br />Heynnett's interpretation t•hemselvrsa. He aisra suggestc?d that the <br />county gain additional insight into the intent of the will by wav <br />of an inter-pretation by the CULWIty Attorrey's office. <br />r rretktp.. Home Dr'!nnnstrati on._-Gardcc <br />Mike Heg4r made a presentation on the Home Demonstration Gardens <br />current 1 y being developed at. the: University of Minnesota Landscape <br />Arboretum. The philosophy of the gardens is to display small garden <br />spaces that homeowners can eiasi l y relate to. Themes included fruits <br />and vegetables, kitchen herbs, dwarf and ,mall growing pi _rrts, <br />wild-f 1 c:,wers, vtc. It wasi stated that the, concept cf they Home <br />Demonstration garden was alsr_.) coiiceived iiy the original Noerenberq <br />Comer ttee prior to th.i Arboretum's beginning iti> plans. <br />Gray opened cep discussion for ideas from the committee as to <br />themes thcai. might be incorporated into tho gardens. Ideas included: <br />Victorian <br />Old English <br />Minnesota native? plant,, <br />Winter g Arden <br />Estate gardens; <br />It was suggested that resources for thv garden planning and design <br />be an individual or firm of national significance. <br />Jvs�:en 7A1pgest0d that th*"I& terms be defined for they next meeting <br />in ortivr thy, -At a distinction bra madQ bi-tween them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.