Laserfiche WebLink
. � �.^ �� .. � . �E�o�. �_L1.L.� �xHl6 iT J <br /> MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 1, 1981 Page 2 � <br /> ' ; <br /> James McGowans, based on the hardship of tfie shape of lot, �' ; <br /> � tlie location of the drainfield, topography to the east ' <br /> ' and based on the following findings: i <br /> ' � 1) No factual evidence of the diminution of the property ' � <br /> value claimed by the .property owner to the west. _ <br /> 2) Proposed keeping of horses is consistent with the intent , <br /> of the comprehensive land use plan for �the rural area of . ; <br /> the City and consistent with the comprehensive park plan , ' ! <br /> based on the proximity of horse trails within the Baker �ark � <br /> Reserve. � <br /> Adams secbnded. Vote: Ayes (7) , Nays (0) . � ' <br /> . ; <br /> � Jack Vest, Mr. Welsh's attorney., was present. Staff re- �✓C. REX WELSH <br /> viewed that there was never a dock constructed on the 650 North Rrm Dr. <br /> property and that the applicant contends that they are Conditional� Use <br /> unable to bring a boat into the area because of the shal- Permit <br /> low waters in the area. � �618 ` <br /> . . � <br /> •McDonald stated that everyone is having, pr.oblems with the g <br /> lake being very low this year. She advises that�the dis- <br /> turbing of the bottom of the lake will destroy the natural <br /> wild life and the fish spawning in the area. � <br /> ' . ! <br /> Bill Wear who was present for another application, stated ' <br /> that he remembered dredging of the channel before and that � � <br /> there was a dock at that time. . - <br /> Jabbour stated that it was difficult to imagine that there � f <br /> was a dock since there was no house. � <br /> Frahm noted in the previous setback variance application <br /> that Welsh submitted a letter stating that he would con- _ <br /> struct a dock meeting all the L.M.C,D's requirements and <br /> the Council's minutes reflected a forewarning to the ap- . <br /> plicant about the possiblity of dredging. <br /> ' I <br /> McDonald asked how long a dock would have to be to bring �' <br /> Mr. Welsh into navigable waters. Mr. Niccum stated that <br /> the dock would have to be 150 ft. � <br /> HanQaerel moved to deny the Conditional '.Use Permit for <br /> dredging based on the findings that� there was no �uidence - � • <br /> ' of a legal dredging permit being issued at that site and the' ` <br /> --- previous warning given to the applicant concerning the,:dredging . -� . <br /> and the construction of a dock noted in the Council minu�es ` <br /> ,_,�=-_ of October 10, 1978. .� � , -_. ...- ----- �.0 ��.�.... _<<,�-_� � , �. <br /> , _ - . -- - <br /> � _Jabbour seconded. Vote: Ayes (7) , Naye, (0) . t ' �� - � � 4�'� " " <br /> �i� <br />