Resolution 1411 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�� .. � RESo� #-�.�--. �CN II�►T I'i MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 17, 1981 Page 3 . and subject to the following conditions: REED (CQIST.�).. �1 - City will not grant setback variances to Lots 1, 2, and 3 for any future construction. 2 - Prior to preliminary approval from Council the following testing must be completed and reviewed by staff: � ._. a) Complete set of septic tests (main & alternate) for f.uture new home on Lot l. . b) Alternate septic site tests for residence on Lot 2. . c) Main septic site testing (4 peres + 2 borings) ' -_ for relocated drainfield for cottage on Lot 3. 3 - Approve conditional use permit for existing guest house based on the following findings: • , a) Lot 3's area has not changed from original Lot 8 Bracketts Point. b) Guest house is used only in the summer months. , c) Guest house has existed for over 20 years. . d) Guest house is a non conforming structure •and ` -T ' . governed by all ordinances dealing with non conforming structures. . � 4 - Noting that the guest hnuse is� in excellent condition ' . , and is assessed at $3,000.00 fair market value. , , ' ` � - �:t _ � • � Goetten seconded. Vote: Ayes (3) , ,Nays (0) . _ �,,�, - y; . •Applicant was not present. Planning Commission had no ,pro- ROBERT WHITE blems with the final subdivision appTication of �Robert 320 Woodhill Rd. Whi�te. . Final Subdivision� � Resoluti`on Jabhour moved to approve the plat of Edgewood Place subject �5804.. � • to, the findings and conditions setforth in the staff , - . '�.:� '., - resolution. � " Goetten seconded. Vote: � Ayes (3) , Nays (0) . _ � _:�,:, Mr. Rex Welsh and Becky Comstock, applicants attorney; were �'REX WELSH present. Ms. Comstock reviewed with the Planning Commission 650 North Arm Dr. the �history of the application. She confirmed .that in-1961 : Conditional Use there was some dredging done. It was done with a, DNR permit. Permit She stated that they were bringing it back to the Planning �618 ' Commission because they felt that they had met the standards. for maintenance ,dredging. LMCD and MCWD have ,also given � �;Rr -r ,, • -�'their''.�approyal _alonq with �the DNR for a maintenance dredge. .a.�, � . . _ ... . - - -r�_,. w �.... _...,.— --___ _ - - _Goetten asked if this property was dredged in 1961 then why _ ' wasn't .it done again 10 years later? '- ��"�` -` 'L � � ___. _ Comstock noted for the record the dock dimension�: 20' :long : 6' wide, meeting all LMCD requirements, � � �iurr asked how will they rip rap it? Comstock noted that all DNR standards would be met. Applicant asks for a channel depth of 4� ' ; it is presently 2�,' .