Laserfiche WebLink
77-159 <br />Nitz, Inc. -3- May 19, 1977 <br />Surface <br />Soil At <br />Rate <br />Test # <br />Elevation <br />Test Depth <br />m i <br />P-1 <br />95.0 <br />Sandy Clay <br />(CL) <br />120 <br />P-2 <br />92.8 <br />Sandy Clay <br />(CL) <br />48 <br />P-3 <br />93.5 <br />Sandy Clay <br />(CL) <br />120 <br />P-4 <br />90.0 <br />Sandy Clay <br />(CL) <br />120 <br />P-5 <br />87.3 <br />Sandy Cldy <br />(CL) <br />35 <br />P-6 <br />86.0 <br />Sandy Clay <br />(CL) <br />34 <br />The average of these 6 initial percolation tests are then 80 <br />mpi. <br />As indicated to you in a telephone conversation, percolation <br />tests P-2, P-5 and P-6 met the percolation requirements <br />while tests P-1, P-3 and P-4 indicated values outside the <br />limits for a typical individual sanitary sewer system. At <br />that time, in our opinion, it appeared likely that a suitable <br />drainfield site can be located in the lower area somewhat to <br />the south of the present proposed location as indicated by <br />tests P-5 and P-6 and on the boring where suitable granular <br />soils were encountered at or near elevation 83±. <br />At your request, on May 17 two additional percolation tests <br />(P-7 and P-8) were performed, approximately 30 feet further <br />south than the location of P-5 and P-6 and both were conducted <br />at or near elevation 81± per the assumed datum. Readings <br />were taken on these two additional percolation tests on May 18 <br />with the following results: <br />Soil At Soil At Rate <br />Test !# Test Depth Test Depth m i <br />P-7 81± Slightly Silty Sand (SP-SM) 10 <br />P-8 81± Slightly Silty Sand (SP-SM) 10 <br />REMARKS: <br />In our opinion, a suitable drainfield can be situated imme- <br />diately to the south of the proposed location with the start <br />of the drainfield at or near the location of percolation <br />tests P-5 and P-6 and running parallel to the downslope <br />contours to the southeast of the proposed house location. <br />Of necessity, the area of the power auger boring and perco- <br />lation tests in relation to the area of the proposed drain - <br />field and the depth of the boring are limited. Suggestions <br />and/or recommendations of this report are opinions based on <br />the data obtained from the boring and the tests. <br />BRAun' <br />ENGINEERING TESTING <br />