My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
12/29/2025 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1010 <br />April 7, 1986 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />2 - Are there unique findings that can be ma3e involving this <br />property' <br />Review the pattern of development within Shadywood plat <br />3 - Will the creation of a new residential unit alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood? Onlv 18 of the 41 lots are developed <br />as originally designed. 14 residental units were increased in size by <br />either combinations with adjacent lots or lot line divisions and <br />combinations. <br />It would appear since the plat was created that there has been a <br />tendency to realign lot lines or combine to make lots bigger. <br />The Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the subdivision and <br />variance application of Duane Hall. Please review exhibit J, the Planning <br />Commission minutes, for the back -ground discussion and findings for denial. <br />Staff would ask Council to consider a more abbreviated review proce- <br />dure for the "simple division" of legally combined lots. If single <br />seperate lots can t 2 developed if they satisfy 80% of the area and width <br />standards without Cc uncil approval than why not legally combined lots if <br />the following findings can be met: <br />1 - division along existing lot. lire <br />2 - setbacks for existing structures can be satisfied (maybe allow <br />up to a 50% setback variance) <br />3 - 80% of area standard exclusive of road rights of way and easments <br />4 - lot width variance not to exceed 50%... 60% <br />5 - consistent with current pattern of surrounding development <br />Mike has completed a "quickie" survey of legally combined lots (not <br />the combination of parts of lots - only whole lots) within the I.R-IC zoning <br />district.. Gaffron 41entified 40 potential cases. Note that the location <br />of existing st.ruc, has not been considered. If an abbreciAt.ed proce- <br />dure was adopted 40 units would qualify (1 on Baldur Park, 2 on <br />Shadywood and 1 or. _ cordia). All others lack the required 80% area if <br />separated on existing lot lines. <br />If Council favors a "simple division" process, staff would proceed <br />with a complete survey of all sewered districts to determine the effects <br />on existing densities and report back at a .later meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.