Laserfiche WebLink
. J , <br />You are upgrading some land and downgrslding oth,&rs. how can <br />,you 'iwm-zone? I question you right! <br />We have taken to overall viow of the entire City and did <br />this as pai + 3f an overall p I an <br />What you are talking o bout Is taking use away from the land, <br />We are not doing it capriciously or arbitrarily. This mould <br />to Illegal. tie aro keeping the public issue In m;nd. <br />As legel Counsel for 'Ar. Neslund. ;hayenne Land Company, I <br />would I 1 ke to s !bm i t my i to the 2 acre zoning <br />the property lnvc;ved I• lit ition and will submit -ur <br />grounds for objection If Ia+tor. <br />Why are you going P!I a way to the tractcs will the sewor on <br />North Willow Drive? <br />Eiornord Kl ugman <br />„hairman VanNest <br />'Aayor -ear i es <br />Walter Crass <br />Don 14 i dd I est <br />St.wer 1s being designed as a trunk i!ne to handle that area. Chairman Vanilest <br />It 's designed In a ment with Long Lake. Are you intores- <br />tc in having the i,c ona around Hackberry zoned differently? <br />I am on County Road <br />6. I am uneasy about having the size of <br />Hilda Hollander <br />tKo lots raised. They <br />are also being revalued now. The <br />prof,srty tripled in <br />valuo last yaar. How definite are the <br />regulations? Will <br />xt: ta ?aying for trunk line? With this <br />zoning, the cost of <br />property In prone will he prohibitive. <br />Oft <br />Q. There; Is no chanza <br />proposed for your area. Leaving It toned <br />Chairman 4anhlest <br />the currenT Y—RreS <br />is what's proposed. The reason for 2 <br />acres and S acres Is <br />to prevent the need to assess 'he trunk <br />to he landowners. <br />We are alev ating the need for people to <br />* their property <br />to pay off a sewer assessment. <br />a the Isck of <br />a Cceprehensivo i­tr. is bad. <br />i l *tartin <br />wauid ilk* to stress <br />that the !(w. proheniive Plan wiiI to <br />amen VanNest <br />completed. <br />Property on 51 adjacent to Maxwell °ley; Ttw property is being Larry Fork <br />(P-,dnpc4 to 112 acre residential. havw owned *his property <br />for 22 yearr i,, 1966, Orono attaarated a slmiiar rezoning as <br />Is being propas sd now. ' went to cm-t . The batt i e ail ex- <br />pense were groat. The court c,,id the C,ty action ras arblt�- <br />rary, and It was zoned back to what It is. Orc„ n will be tek- <br />on to court again f:ar arbitrary action --a the duc,slon of tha <br />court would ba the some. <br />Thera IS an excess i vo amount of LA-k if) the 4axwe ! I aroa . Tho Cra I rrvin vnnflest <br />LWO has don► resoarch In -the area ar.d sratistics .,ave ht+er <br />camp la(' StatlstICS h,v® proven the Maxwell %v ; c ono n, <br />tha wore: bays for I)oa+ 4f'.7rago, lit lino with overel i phi i- i- <br />tphy for protecting le-w M,nnotc-nke, 1 do not #eel we are bei, <br />QcerR-;r t c I u:ri or arb' trery by atti%�_ k i nl ttq ,)rob i rms ias we are. <br />I hope � u Are sincere. You nave cut dcr.4.s from SOC' to 2W'. Larry . k <br />It 1, all taken tLn to ",ovtr Ict Itw .rse ut tl%% Ink*. Wr'y should <br />II -no marine be ponali?+d? Ay was the stno marins singled <br />