Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 10, 1986 <br />#967 & #968 IDSTROM continued <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator noted that the driveway <br />has been reviewed by staff and finds no problem with the <br />access location. He also noted the potential of a <br />future third lot which w create problems for the <br />applicant. <br />iyor Butler stated that the resolution shoulC note the <br />potential problems regarding future re -subdivision which <br />Mould require the relocation of the access to properties <br />off the private street. <br />Mr. Idstrom stated he was not concerned with a third lot <br />at this time and would deal with that problem in the <br />future if it arc.se. <br />Councilmember Aean!: stated he ` ind no problem with the <br />proposed subdivision of two lc only but would if there <br />were three. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Adams, seconded by <br />Councilmember Frahm, directing staff to draft a <br />resolution with the appropriate variance relating the <br />frontage and specifying that this is approval of two <br />lots noting the future problems of a third lot, to be <br />presented before final approval at the March 24, 1986 <br />Council meeting. Motion, Ayes 3, Nays 0. <br />#990 WARD FERRF <br />3405, 3411, 341t� weATERTOWN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />Ward Ferrell was present for this matter along with his <br />attorney, Leroy Haglund. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a variances on two existing lots, which are in the 2 <br />acre zone and are substandard under the current code. <br />He stated that this was presented last May as a zoning <br />appeal. He noted that a- licant has had septic site <br />testing done and hr+s pro._sed acceptable primary and <br />alternate sites. <br />Mr. Haglund stated that. applicant's dream was to build a <br />house on one of these lots and was platted as such many <br />years ago. He submitted a petition signed by the <br />neighbors stating they have no objections to this <br />proposal. He also submitted aerial photos to sho. that <br />the applicant's proposal would not, be inco 'stant with <br />the area. <br />3 <br />