My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
12/29/2025 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recommendation <br />That the MCTFLM report descrihe `he issue and recommend further study on use <br />from commercial access as an mrortant data source to guide several surface use <br />decisions. Specificaily, it would be very helpful to determine the following <br />characteristics about users from commercial access f `5: <br />- Numbers and use t as; <br />- Type of use; ant <br />- Origin, destiny on and zones or sub zones of greatest use. <br />The information should be acquired with other information in the process recom- <br />mended by MCTFLM whicn calls f.)r a more active LMCD, working in conjunction <br />with continued research by PNR and by the Metropolitan Council. <br />ISSUE 8: RESEARCH ON RECREATION USE OF LAKE MINNETONKA <br />Introduction <br />Several agencies and groups have co ducted research recreational use Lake <br />Minnetonka. The issue for the task force was whether any of this data is of <br />sufficient quality to be of use in making policy decisions regarding lake use. <br />n order to judge the quality of data, one must consider its: <br />Validity, that is, whether the research method yielded a true picture of <br />use at the time the data was collected, and <br />2. Reliability, ti is, tihether the research method was repeated often enough <br />to account i.)- ne variation in use that occurs at different times, on <br />different days and under varying use conditions. <br />Each source of data on lake use will be evaluated on these tF-o points. <br />Who Has Collected Data on Use of Lake Minnetonka? <br />Several agencies have collected data on use of Lake Minnetonka. The following <br />five efforts have yielded data useful in task force discussions. <br />Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) <br />The LMCD has collected data on surface use and shoreline boat storage for <br />several years, the last being done in 1982. Surface use data includes <br />numbers of boats in various parts of the lake at peak times on summer peak <br />day The boats are classified as to type. Pric.• to 1981. the counts were <br />made from an airplane. In 1981 and 1983, counts were made from aerial <br />photographs. Boats stored in slips along the shoreline have been counted <br />+r•d classified for several years as well. This is generaily done at a low <br />use time -f the season when the maximum number of boats are li-.ely io be i, <br />'.heir slips. The counts are made by boat. <br />2. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) <br />The DNR has conducted two different kinds of studies on Lake Minnetonka. <br />First, the standard "creel census" work done as part of ongoing fish man- <br />agement of the lake. The most recent of these studies was done in 1975. <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.