My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
12/29/2025 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Additional expenditures include (amounts not accurately known because items are <br />within larger budgets): <br />- Suburban Hennepin Regional Park Distract islands, toilet and trash cleanup, <br />other picnic facility maintenance. <br />- Communities --access (boat launch and shoreline) toilet and trash cleanup <br />are assumed, no specific data has been received on this topic. <br />- Minnesota DNR--information and education, especially about boating safety <br />plus cooperative enforcement -related activities with Hennepin County <br />Sheriff's water patrol. <br />finding <br />Funding for enforcement and maintenance on Lake Minnetonka is not adequate to <br />meet the present need. Funds for research, planning, administration and <br />education/awareness are so inadequate that they are limiting needed activity. <br />Recommendation <br />Funding sources should be found and adequate allocations made to support the <br />agencies carrying out needed activities on the lake. <br />The following alternatives are recommended: <br />1. An increase in the boating safety fund and an increase in grants from that <br />fund made by the state to operating agencies. There are two possible <br />sources from which the fund may be increased. The first possibility is <br />that the Minnesota Legisla'vre can increase the allocation made to the boat <br />safety account from existing sources. Second, added revenues can come to <br />the fund from increased boat license fees in Minnesota. An increase in <br />boat fund revenues should be followed by an increase in grants to the <br />active agencies. The increase should be above the current base operating <br />allocations and should be distributed by a supplementary formula that <br />recognizes and encourages local effort. <br />2. LMCD and other authorized agencies should maximize revenues from permit <br />fees, marina fees and other development and commercial use fees. The task <br />force recognizes that such fees are normally able to cover the cost of <br />services at best, thus are not likely to constitute a significant source of <br />revenue for new activities. <br />3. Some MCTFLM members continue to urge consideration for a special license <br />fee for all boats using Lake Minnetonka. The advantages of such a program <br />lie in its equity and its direct tie to users. <br />Task force members recognized the difficulty of such an approach, which <br />lies in the perception of many decision -makers statewide who fear that a <br />special sticker for any one lake will open the floodgates to demands for a <br />sticker for every major lake in the state. Clearly, this alternative <br />requires major legislation changing the way license revenues are raised. <br />4. The LMCD tax levy should be outside the lakeshore communities' 'cry 1 mits <br />and should be levied directly. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.