My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
12/29/2025 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT g 3 <br />VARIANCES VIA INDIVIDUAL LOT MERIT - LOTS IN SEWERED AREAS <br />There exists numerous zoning file cases that evidence the Council's <br />meticulous and judicious application of the zoning standards but one <br />stands out as being recent and similar to the current application. <br />By resolution * 1719 granting the following variances to municipal <br />zoning code section 10.25, subdivision 6 (B) the council appeared to <br />establish the reasonable procedure of approving lots on individual <br />merit. It approved lots that (1) were at least 55' in width and (2) <br />were 77% of the required square footage, and (3) were in sewered LR-IC <br />single family lakeshore residential zoning districts. <br />The Council noted uniquely important detail such as the property is <br />consistent in area with other developed lots and approximates the <br />narrowest -lots �in-the neighborhood. <br />In summary, the Council acted on the following Planning Commission <br />findings: <br />a) No available land on either side of property. <br />b) The property is sewered and watered. <br />c) Additional variances would not, be needed. <br />d) No negative effects on public health, safety, and welfare. <br />e) The variance is consistent with the area's development. <br />f) No future need for hardcover and setback variances. <br />g) The conditions of the land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. <br />h) The conditions do not apply generally to other land in district. <br />i) Granting of the application is necessary for the preservation aid <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. <br />j) Granting the variances will iAnt in anyway impair the health, <br />safety, comfort, morals, or in any .ether respect be contrary to <br />the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />k) Granting of the proposed variances will not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The City Council is to be commended for acting in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br />City. Without including unnecessary detail at this point, suffice it <br />to say the Council's Conclusions, Orders and Conditions were appro <br />priately comprehensive and considered. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.