My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
04-14-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2025 11:42:36 AM
Creation date
12/29/2025 11:29:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
383
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXHIBITS: 1. West Shore of Crystal Bay <br />2. 16 New Properties Precedent <br />3. Variances by Lot Merit <br />4. Property Owner Rights <br />Granting this applicant's request for lot line rearrangement and <br />variance is reasonable and: <br />THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED W TS ARE CONSISTENT WITH TIC' AREA DEVELOPMENT <br />AND APPROXIMATE THE MAJORITY OF THE LOTS IN THE AREA <br />The two proposed lots are consistent with 7 out of 10 developed lots <br />in the area, they are admitedly 5 to 10 feet wider and larger in area <br />than most of the lots but consistent never--the--less. I direct Your <br />attention at this point to exhibit gl which shows that r:it lots in <br />the area of the applicant's property are equal to or so ler than the <br />applicant's proposed lots in both lot area and lot width. <br />SUBDIVIDING PAIRED LOTS WILL NOT CREATE A BUILDING BOOM <br />zoning concern that has been considered in the past is the <br />:ottention that granting variances and sub -divisions to adjacent lots <br />under common ownership will result in one -for -one increases in new <br />homes in the area. The data in exhibit *2 clearly shows this is not <br />the case because at least three --quarters of the paired lots in the <br />area have exr�^sive homes centered on the pair of lots, crossing the <br />shared lot I , leaving no room for building additional homes. <br />COMMON SENSE AND REASONING PRE'.,kltS IN ORONO PLANNING RECOMMENDATIONS <br />AND COUNCIL APPLICATIONS OF THE CGMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE <br />This applicant respectfully requests the Commission study exhibit * 3 <br />attached, review the cr:..aris detailed there, and send forth reasoned, <br />relevant findings (see those listed) and a reccmlendation that the <br />sub -division and variance be granted. <br />A DENIAL OF MY REQUEST IS ARBITRARY AND INROVITABLF TREATMENT <br />PRODUCING AND UNNBCRSSARY HARDSHIP <br />Exhibit 1 4 Jetails why I believe this to be true. More important, <br />my knowledge and sense of right and wrong tells we that I have a right <br />to build a new home on the extra land I own as long as my actions are <br />consistent with '.he development of the area I live in and I conform to <br />and approxicstp whet others are doing in the area where I live. <br />THANK YOU FOR CONSIDERING THIS REQUEST <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.