Project packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

To: Planning Commission ChairmaL Kelley Orono Planning Commission Me-bers City Administrator Bernhardson From: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator Date: May 13, 1987 Subject: #1122 Board of Governors of Big Island Veterans Camp - Phase III - Conceptual Review of Final Development Plan - Second Review List of Exhibits Exhibit E - Capital Improvement and Revenue Plan - Encloscl (Originally included in your March packet) Exhibits G & H - Refer to Exhibits Included in March 16th Packet Exhibit K - Gaffron Memo Dated 5/14/87 Staff has asked the Chairman of the Planning Commission for his permission to reschedule the conceptual review of the final development plans for the Veteran's Camp facility at the May 18, 1987 meeting. It was apparent that the majority of the Planninq Commission found it difficult, if not impossible, to dF with an assignment involving a recommendation of conceptual directives for the future use of the facility and the rehabilitation of specific structures never seen before. . . It. is our hope that after your tour of the faci lti y and you become more acquainted with the site and conditions of existing structures that we can once again proceed with our original task. The applicant would like the opportunity to address the issue raised at our last meeting r,2garding funding of the improvements. Staff has enclosed a capital improvement budget with estimated annual revenues to support their ten year improvement plan (Fxh ' it E). We would encourage any comments you may have regarding the meth of funding or on any other aspect of the fiscal plan. Staff has also been asked by the applicant for your reconsideration regarding the need to come before the City for each required variance when an existing cabin 4s scheduled for rehabilitation. It would be staff's intention once the final Rehabilitation/Development plans have been approved by Council to bring back a phased or specific area for the City to review probably on an annual basis based on the Board's funding capability and volunteer effort. Each review may consist of multiple variances but would be c Aflered by the City under one application. In . wina the staff memo of April 30, 1987, specificaIIy the section r. ge tat lists the issues for consideration in our phase III review ann and in light of direction already received by the Planning Commission at your May 4th meeting, staff would suggest the following oilt,.line for discussion purposes: