Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1277 Page 3 of 5 Item 5. On site sewage treatment. As staff not.FA In the earlier review, Mike Gaffron has confirmed that the South Hill and the Peanut Row lavatory structures are adaquate to serve the day use recreation area, review Exhibit E, specifically page 3, the summary section. Although the Hennepin County Health Department has no jurisdiction at this point, the applicant does plan to send the interior elevations of the toilets for their review. Item 6. The applicants propose no new structures with the day use recreation area. Item 7. The applicant reports that they have a telephone line, as required for emergency telephone purposes. Item 8. Property is most certainly located directly on the shoreline with adequate 6,500 linal feet of that shoreline. Item 9. Based on our plat maps, the property is still shown with three sep'crate tax parcels and should be combined as one. Our plat maps are old and applicant may have already completed the legal combination at this point. If not, the City would ask that they legally combine all three tax parcels. This completes the review of the sta 'ands set forth unde.- the day use recreation use. Staff would now like iddress the items noted on page 3 of the staff memo, dated May 13, 1988. Item 1 of that memo deals with the upgrading of the site plan. All existing structures are shown on the site plan. Applicant advises that picnic shelters are not planned for the immediate opening of the day recreation area, but picnic tables will be provided. The area of picnicking has been designated, there is no actual number or picnic tables. The fire stations and fire ring areas have been located on the site plan. Review Exhibits J, and L. Staff would ask that a non-combustible surface be provided least 4' around all of the subject structures. Staff has the following comments on the fire alarm station: the fire triangle must be hung with chain, not wire and a sign should be provided near the triangle that says "fire alarm use only". The new dock areas have been shown, including the informal mooring area of the boats, along the southwest shoreline. Future helltad sites have been shown. The 10, 14, aluminum fishing boats will be stored to the west of the dock area, adjacent to the shoreline. The applicant has advised that the} have no current plans to subdivide the property. If Planning Commission has any specific comments to make regarding the site plan for this facility, ;lease note them at the meeting. Item 2 of the staff memo. Applicant has proceeded with applying for an LMCD permit for the expansion of the joint dock and has also applied for a joint use dock license with the City for a total of 28 boat units. As part of the joint use dock license reviews, staff must ask for a more detailed plan of the three docks, giving the dimensions and the length of the dock and designating the slip area. Applicant must provide a more detailed ;Ian of docks prior to Counci l's approval of the joint use dock license.