My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
03-10-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2025 10:10:52 AM
Creation date
12/22/2025 9:56:18 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
435
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
E /F <br />To: Planning Commission [Members <br />From: mic)ael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />Date: Februar_, 6, 1986 <br />Subject: #990 Ward Ferrell 3405-3411-3415 Watertown Road - <br />Variances - Update to Memo of November 13, 1985 <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Memo of 11/13/85 With Exhibits <br />Exhibit B - Survey of Property With Existing House <br />Exhibit C - Soils Report, Site Plan For Existing House <br />Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/85 <br />F_xH, E — C0rM0bt'?S1rF Sf- PLAN <br />Mr. Ferrell has nu%, submitted the additional survey and <br />soils report to show ail alternate drainfield site for the <br />existing house. Given no future encroachments, there is adequate <br />area on the lot with the existing house to replace the septic <br />syst-m with a fully conforming system. <br />Please review the memo of 11/13/85. As noted . n that memo <br />and considering the additional information submitted, it appears <br />technically possible to place a house, garage, driveway, well, <br />and primary and alternate septic systems cn each of the lots. <br />The possible house location would be somewhat l.mited by the <br />drainfield sites. There wo-ild be potential c,)nf licts 4 f a <br />situation occurred where an extremely large hcuso, pool, tennis <br />cr,u-'�, etc. were proposed. The properties lerd themselves to <br />rel :vely low levels of development. <br />Finally, from a zoning code standpoint, evt.;n 'f only one new <br />building site is granted, this is precedent. setting. In the <br />past, Council and Planning Commission have generall.held the <br />line in similar unsewered common ownership situations. Approval <br />of 1 or 2 new building sites might have long-term i-pact on <br />Orono's effectiveness in avoiding sewer. Weigh this against the <br />applicant's meal and preceived rights as a property owner and the <br />history of zoning code changes over the years. Are there <br />sufficient justifications to grar:t a variance? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.