My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4660
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 0001-7547
>
Reso 4600 - 4699 (January 22, 2001 - October 8, 2001)
>
Resolution 4660
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2015 2:13:26 PM
Creation date
11/16/2015 2:13:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � i . <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> ��,. - C ITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> �,� G'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kES�I�4�' NO. � 6 6 0 . <br /> , 6. In 1981, Beito again applied for a variance to lot area and width (File #627) concurrently <br /> with a similar application by the owner of the adj acent vacant Lot 6(Hans Weiler,File#628). <br /> Weiler also owned the developed residential property directly across the road from Lot 6 <br /> (1135 North Arm Drive, PINS #07-117-23 14 0064). Beito and Weiler claimed that the <br /> increase in taxes has forced them to apply for variances to make each lot buildable. <br /> 7. On July 20, 1981 the Orono Planning Commission voted 6-0 on a motion to recommend <br /> � denial of the variances for each individual lot, based on the lack of sufficient hardship and <br /> the following findings: <br /> a) The owners have received substantial benefit in the use of these lots for private <br /> lakeshore access purposes. <br /> b) A substantial property value remains in each lot since it can be sold for combination <br /> with the other. <br /> c) These individual lots are not unique or special since all nearby building sites(except <br /> Heit Lot 8) have been created by combination of 2 or more lots similar to these. <br /> • d) Neither lot has been assessed for sewer as a separate building site. <br /> e) Granting of two adjacent 50' lakeshore lots in a 140'minimum district is contrary to <br /> the intent of the zoning code. Combination into one 100'wide lot would at least meet <br /> the minimum DNR Shoreland management regulations,the LR-1 C'/z acre district lot <br /> width , and be similar to most nearby l�akeshore lot widths. <br /> 8. On August 10, 1981 the City Council tabled the application at the applicants request and no <br /> further action occurred regarding the variance request. <br /> 9. In approximately 1991 Beito sold Lot 7 and 1169 North Arm Drive to Todd Van Den Einde. <br /> In July 1998 the current applicant, Kristi Roesler, purchased Lot 7 and 1169 North Arm <br /> Drive from Van Den Einde. During each transaction, City files containing the history of <br /> variance denials were available to the property owners for review. <br /> 10. The current estimated market value for Lot 7 per Hennepin County Tax records for 2001 is <br /> $50,000. The current estimated market value for adjacent Lot 6, �vhich is similar in status . <br /> to Lot 7 as a separately owned vacant lakeshore lot and similar in area and width to Lot 7, <br /> is$50,000. By contrast,the current estimated market value for the land portion of adjacent <br /> Lot 8 (which contains a residence structure and includes an additional 6,200 s.f. of non- <br /> shoreline land because it is combined with Lot 19 across Elmwood Avenue) is $160,000. <br /> � _ Page 3 of 7 <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.