2125 Carriage Lane 2025 Compliance

Home Browse Search

Property address: 2125 Carriage Lane, Orono _ inspector initials/Date: JS�_9/10/2020 _ (mmidd/yyyy) 4. Soil Separation — Compliance component #4 of 5 Date of installation: 10/27/2000 ❑ Unknown Verification method(s): (mm/ddlyyyy) Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food beverage ® Yes ❑ No observations by two independent parties are sufficient, lodging? Compliance criteria: For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and ❑ Yes ❑ No not located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Area or not serving a food, beverage or lodging establishment: Drainfield has at least a two -foot vertical j separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. Non-performance systems built April 1, ® Yes ❑ No 1996, or later or for non-performance systems located in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging establishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock.* 'Experimental", "Other, or "Performance" ❑ Yes [--]No systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type /V or V systems built under 2008 Rules (7080. 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced inspector License required) Drainfield meets the designed vertical separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrock. Any "no" answer above indicates the system is failing to protect groundwater. unless site conditions have been altered or local requirements differ. ® Conducted soil observation(s) (Attach boring togs) ❑ Two previous verifications (Attach boring logs) ❑ Not applicable (Holding tank(s), no drainfield) ❑ Unable to verify (See Comments/Explanation) ❑ Other (See Comments✓Explanation) Comments/Explanation: Boring: 1-12" 10yr 2/2 sandy loam 13- 55" 10 yr 4/4 sandy laom No Redox Indicate depths or elevations 16" fill may have A, Bottom of distribution media _ been added ontop i B. Periodically saturated soil/bedrock 55"+ C. System separation 39"+ _D: __Regulred compliance separation' 36" *May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local Ordinance, 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP* — Compliance component #5 of 5 ® Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", A below is required Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes", B below is required BMP = Best Management Practice(s) specified in the system design If the answer to both questions is "no", this section does not need to be completed Compliance criteria a. Operating Permit number: Have the Operating Permit requirements been mete [] Yes El No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functioning?_— ❑Yes [] No _ __... Any "no" answer indicates Noncompliance. Upgrade Requirements (Minn. Stat. § 115.55) An imminent threat to public health and safety (ITPHS) must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance, if an existing system is not failing as defined in law, and has at least two feet of design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded, repaired, replaced, or its use discontinued, notwithstanding any local ordinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas, or those used in connection with food, beverage, and lodging establishments as defined in law. www.pca.state.mn.us 651-296-6300 800-657-3864 TTY 651-282.5332 or 800-657-3864 Available in alternative formats wq-wwists4-31 • 3116112 Page 3 of 3