Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 15, 2007 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />type variance is requested to allow the addition to be constructed on post footings rather than a <br />perimeter foundation. Retaining wall height, location, and hardcover variances are also requested. <br />The existing seasonal dwelling on the property was constructed in 1968. It is a 702 square foot cabin on <br />a post foundation with a 312 square foot lakeside deck At the lake side the floor is about seven feet <br />above grade. At the rear the floor is roughly at grade. The crawl space under the cabin is enclosed. <br />The entire structure is within the 75-foot setback. The deck is 35 feet from the lake at one comer and <br />33.8 feet at the other. <br />The dwelling is legal non-conforming. State statutes would allow the cabin to be totally reconstructed <br />in its current form with a perimeter foundation or a post foundation. A variance would be required to <br />convert the crawl space to living space between it would be an expansion of the use and the cabin would <br />need to be raised several feet to provide adequate ceiling height. <br />A septic system has recently been installed and some additional grading and construction of a retaining <br />wall is necessary. Retaining walls in the seasonal recreational district are restricted to 42 inches in <br />height and the applicants are proposing 48 inches. The City Engineer has determined that the retaining <br />wall should be constructed at 48 inches in height. <br />heJ~l-J+ ~ IOGl\li""' <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the retaining wall within tae 75 250 fGot hooe and approval of <br />the other variances with conditions if the Planning Commission determines it appropriate to grant them. <br />In addition, Planning Staff would like the Planning Commission to consider whether there are ways to <br />mitigate the visual and water quality impacts of the variances. For structural reasons the entire structure <br />should be on the same type of foundation. Staff does not have a position on the foundation type <br />variance. The reasons for requiring a perimeter foundation are unclear and only in the recreational <br />season district are perimeter foundations required. Both types of foundation have frost footings. <br />Ross Langhans stated the applicants would like to add some space to accommodate their family. <br />Langhans noted he did work with Staff on upgrading the septic system and that as a result of the work <br />on the septic system, a retaining work is required and they will be submitting the required engineering <br />for the retaining wall. <br />PAGE 18