Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

It was moved by Peterso~, ~econded by Smith, to recommend approval of application # 1858 for John and Marla_Mendith, 3?85 Watertown Road for variances discussed being that the accessory structure IS 4,800 s.f. mstead of the allowable 3,000 s.f. Smith added that if the property was ever subdivided, the owner would take responsibility for those structures. Also required is the updated survey, and the understanding that maximum allowable horses on this property is 7 based on the size of the land and is for personal use and not a business . Vot_e: Ayes 7,. Nays 0. • (#10) #1859 JEFFREY H. MUELLER 222 BEDER WOOD DRIVE -V AR,IANCES -PUBLIC.HEARING Mr. Mueller was present. Mabusth explained that the applicant seeks approval of a setback variance that would allow an accessory structure to be placed in the front of the front line of the principle structure. The structure will also require a side setback variance. The improvement involves a complete replacement of the detached garage within the street yard of the property. It will be built within the current building envelope. Mabusth asked the applicant whether he could move the structure over enough to meet the side setback. Mr. Mueller agreed that he could do that. It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of application #1859 for Jeffrey H. Mueller, 222 Bederwood Drive for accessory structure built in front of the front line of the principle structure. Vote: Ayes 7 Nays 0. (#11) #1860 ZELMA H. MCKINNEY 3599 LIVINGSTON A VENUE -CONDmONAL USE PERMIT -PUBLIC HEARING Mrs. McKinney was present and accompanied by her daughter, Gayle Siegler. Mabusth explained that property is located in Navarre Heights on Livingston street. Mrs. McKinney purchased the property in May, 1962 when triplex use would have been permitted. It was always used as a rental property. There have been zoning amendments since whereby only single family residential use would be allowed. Mrs. McKinney is applying for a conditional use permit per Section 31.100 of the 1975 Code. Mrs. McKinney seeks approval of two residential units; one to be owner-occupied and the other a rental apartment. The majority of neighbors that called were satisfied to hear that the property would be owner- occupied duplex and ·only one neighbor pref erred to see the property revert to single family dwelling status. Commission members felt the property was visually appealing and if the property did revert · to single family, the exterior of the structure would not be altered in anyway. 13