Laserfiche WebLink
#722 - Ski Tonka, i..;. <br />March 10, 1982 <br />Page 3 <br />The setbacks of the <br />Frc• ` Setback <br />Re ed - 100' <br />Exi. ..ng - .20' <br />.sting house are as follows: <br />Re ai Setback <br />Side Setback <br />Required - 100' Required - 50' <br />Existing - 1.10' East side - 30' <br />West side - 160' <br />There can be no future .expansion to the east of the house but there <br />may be expansion on the north and west side of the house. The <br />expansion to the -lest must extend along the existing front line of <br />t-he house. The City could not oormit any further encroachment into <br />the 30' front yard. <br />How much area should be s,..-t aside for the future use of 4740 Bayside Road <br />a) 49' X 218' corridor along north property line (realign north -south <br />dimension to match lot to immediate east) <br />Gaffron (Exhibit H) confirms that this is adequate area to solve <br />all future septic needs. Per Oberhauser letter (Exhibit F) will <br />this corridor permit expansion of the existing house? There is <br />adequate area now to permit expansion to the west and north on the <br />house. If a new hc;use were to be built on the site, will there be <br />an adequate sized building envelope? Review Exhibit L. The area <br />of the lot is 52,756 sq. ft. or 1.2 acres - no change in lot width. <br />A building envelope of 11I 42' - a limited building envelope <br />for the RR-lA zoning dic;.rict in consideiAtion of the normal rural <br />uses of such lots. <br />The applicant and the Dinns have discussed the purchase of a parcel <br />running 20' wide along the west property line: and 49' wide along <br />the north property line (see Exhibit M). The Planning Commission <br />approved the acquisition finding this a fair --ompromise not wishing <br />to create financial burden on the Dunns or :Hake a charity case <br />for Primus. Review tLxhibit J, th,: minutes of the Planning Comml3sion <br />meeting of February 7, 1983. <br />b) One Acre Addition <br />Review Exhibit N. The building envelope is more consist^r.t with <br />rural residential uses. 'rho lot is r,)nsist�nt in size witn '-he <br />RR-1: zoning district on the south side of Bayside Road. Morc <br />than adequate area -o meet all future septic needs. The addition <br />of one acre would satisfy the standards setforth for lots of <br />single separate ownership in a rural residential district por <br />Ordinance 31. 203. <br />