Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TO: Planninq Commission FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Administrator DATE: February 3, 1983 SUBJECT: #722 Ski-Tonka, Inc. 4740 Bayside Road - Variance Planning Commission Action - To deny or approve subject to conditions Exhibits: A) Gaffron memo B) Hennepin County Highway Deptartment letter 1/27/83 C) Building Envelope with 491X218' of additional land D) Revised sketch E) Oberhauser letter 1-19-83 The Hennepin County Highway Department has reviewed the Dunn property for the purpose of improving the existing access. They find the exist- ing access the only acceptable one. To move the access further west is not feasible because it would place it too close to the intersection of the Ring Route and CSAH 84. The topography prevents a safe access further east. The larger Primus lot will not be approved for direct access onto CSAH 84. The access to this property will be via the Ring Route. The Public Works Director will approve all new curb cuts. I have been advised that the applicant and the Dunns are attempting to come to some form of an agreement on the sale of additional land. I have advised both parties that until Council acts, we have no idea as to the size of that lot. The Eanns have stated for the public record their desire to acquire additional land from Primus. Mrs. Dunn has been kind enough to submit photographs and slides of her property for review at the meeting. The surveyor has submitted a revised sketch showing the property platted to the centerline. The Dunn property now has a depth of 193' with a total I t area of 42074 sf. or .96 acres. The improvements have been relocated within the lot lines huf it a ?" ?nn'scale with merely a sketch there is no Pcruracy. At our last meeting, Planning Commission determined a subdivision would be required as a condition of this variance approval. The survey required for the subdivision will certify all improv- ments. Planning Commission must now determine the size of the parcel to be combined ith the Dur- Int. -J) 49' X 218' Corriu-. along North Property Line. Gaffron (Exhibit A) confirms that this is adequate area to solve all future septic needs. Per Oberhauser letter (Exhibit E) will this corridor permit expansion of the existing house? Please remember the substandard setback to the east will prevent expansion on the east. (50' req., 30' existing). There is adequate area now to permit expansion to the west and north on the house. (rear setback req. 100' - existinq 140', side setback required 50'