Laserfiche WebLink
are of Mr. Sine, I think 1:.'ie.re was two years of work <br />that he spent on the Planning Commission and i i:."nk if <br />he did yet that feeling f. rom the Counci 1 meet ing t.h it he <br />certainly shcild receive an apoloqy from all of ui for <br />having that kind of news be brought to his attention <br />about his re -appointment in such a way. <br />Councilmember. Frahm: As I recall, we said that we had a <br />question on him and that we would like him to cone in <br />front of the Council to discuss that question. <br />Acting Mayor Adams: Frankly, I was very surpriser-A by his <br />letter, because t o me it forced a decision that hadn't <br />hAen made in my mind, it .jumped to a conclusion that I <br />did not feel... <br />Councilmember Frahm: I don't remember reading the <br />minutes on that particular thing, but as I recall, we <br />had requested that. he come in front of the Council and <br />discuss it. <br />Zon.inq Administrator Mabusth: In the December meeti.nq we <br />just. assumed he was to be continued because we kept <br />delivering packets to him in January, so we didn't <br />really cc-isider his term had expired. <br />Councilmember Hammerel: But. Tom, I don't think we <br />discuss ' him coming before the Council. I think the <br />Mayor b ght it up that some things happened during the <br />year that... <br />Councilmember Grabek: I think it was duscussed quite <br />vividly, I remember it, I re— ii r-mber your comments and <br />everybody e 1 se's comments... <br />Councilmember Hammerel: I think Tim expressed some <br />feeling about it and so did I. I don't think you said <br />anything, but I don't remember anything about bringing <br />him before the Council. But then the next thing we knew <br />we got a letter from him. <br />Acting Mayor Adams: The whole episode is a little bit <br />symbolic of the very problem that I was having was one <br />of communication in working with Bill. <br />Councilmember Grabck: I think that problem is really <br />4nitiated by not talk.:ng to Bill about it but bringing <br />it up at a Council meeting and meeting it head on with <br />him, T think thats not a good way for anybody to hear <br />about. that. But I guess I mi sunder .tool that I thought <br />we were just making a decision on who we were qoinq to <br />re- ippoint. and that he was not going to be re -appointed, <br />or at l vast_ he had the opportunity that maybe he would <br />still be re -appointed but we wanted to look at other <br />people that may come before the Council. Thats the way <br />3 <br />