My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-10-1986 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
02-10-1986 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2025 10:15:14 AM
Creation date
12/18/2025 10:12:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
131��•,.e! <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />�U�� x� <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrat4( \1 rt '3 <br />1 01986 <br />DAIPO- January 31, 1986 CITY OF OR <br />ONO Pla!ininq commission Appointments O�0 <br />At your last Counci 1 meeting y; i interviewed three individuals <br />for the position on th Planning Commission. These were as <br />follows: <br />Maureen Bellows, Architect <br />Carol Moore Trapp, Attorney <br />.Jim Hansen, Developer (r.2al estate, software) <br />Each of thesA individuals wou-d , r their unique perspectives <br />to the Planning Commission and r,alize given their well qualified <br />backgroun�ls, it may be tough to make a dec '.sion. Based on those <br />qualifications it was suggested that staff look at alternatives <br />to possibly having all three individuals on the Commission. <br />The issue of accommodating all three individuals can be addressed <br />in one of two ways: <br />a. Expansion of the Planning Commission by an ordinance <br />change from seven to nine members. Obviously this puts <br />all three of them on equal footing and is something that <br />has been done in the past. I understand that in recent <br />years that the Planning Commission was reduced from nine <br />to seven members in part because of concerns regarding <br />quorum and number of people needed for a majority vote. <br />b. Second would be to appoint one person to th- Planning <br />Commission and through an ordinance change allow for two <br />alternate members. Th,� two alt^rnates would always <br />receive packets and approximately a week in advance of <br />the Planning Commission determine where there would be <br />absences and request of the alternates attend those as <br />full Planning Commission members. This eventually could <br />he a training spot for future Planning Commission <br />members. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is staff's recommendation that the Council amend the ordinance <br />to al`-)w for use of alternates on the Planning Commission. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by �, seconded by _ that the Counci l <br />di:ect staff to bring back language amending Ordinance # 2.51 to <br />allow for appointment of up to three lternatt?s to the Planning <br />Commission. Ayes Nays w <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by , seconded by that _ be <br />appointed as a member -)f the Ocono Planning Commi;.;ion. Ryes) , <br />N 3 Y s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.