Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD DECEMBER 16, 1985. PAGE 5 <br />#983 WALTER H. PEMBERTON <br />1. To limit the fill in the 0-75' zone to only that <br />necessary to accomodate the garage and driveway bark -up <br />apron. <br />2. The proposed house must meet a 11 specif ications of <br />the Building Inspector of the City of Orono. If the <br />house changes in proportion, the applicant must come <br />back for review by the Planning Commission and Council. <br />3. Applicant must i.nfo:..7 the City of the date of whic. n <br />the fill will be delivered to the lot. <br />4. Front deck must remain as an open de^k - it cannot <br />be enclosed. <br />5. Staff to secure proper erosion control. <br />Mr. Pemberton questioned if no fill is required, because of <br />the push back of the garage, will staff still have to <br />monitor. <br />Kelley stated that yes, tte City still should be notified at <br />that point. <br />Motion, Ayes 4, Ploys 2. <br />Chairman Callahan opposed the motion because the lot is too <br />small for the proposed house and garage, and the var` ^ces <br />cculd be eliminated if the applicant were to build on on <br />the existing foundation. <br />McDonald also opposed the motion based on the same findings <br />as Chairman Callahan and also the City should maintain a mix <br />of housing, all income level-, and family sizes. <br />P%NKAWA <br />BERT J. BAUMAN ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />SECOND REVIEW <br />Robert And Joan Bauman were present. Bob Gasch of 2960 Fox <br />Street and Marge Gasch of 1030 Tunkawa Roac.: were also present. <br />from the public. <br />Assist.ant. Zoning Administrator Gaffren presented the <br />Commission with a letter submitted by the Marge Gasch which <br />Chairman Callahan react (Exhibit B). <br />Kelley clarified that there is no need for a hardcover <br />variance because* of the trade-offs done for a previous appli- <br />cation and they only variance needed in for average lakeshore <br />setback. <br />