Laserfiche WebLink
A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISION 1 S 2 <br />FILE #987 <br />WHEREAS, Robert J. Bauman (hereinafter "the applicant") is <br />the owner of the property located at 1040 Tonkawa Road within the City <br />of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 10 and that part of Lot 9 lying Northerly of the following <br />described line and its Easterly and Westerly extensions: <br />Beginning at the point of intersection of the Westerly line <br />of said Lot 9 with a line drawn parallel with and 140 feet <br />South, measured at right angles, from the North line of said <br />Lot 10; thence East along said parallel line 35 feet; <br />thence deflecting left 4 degrees to an intersection with a <br />line drawn parallel with and Ill feet South, measured at <br />right angles, from said North line of Lot 10; thence East <br />along said last -described parallel line to the Easterly line <br />of said Lu, 9, and there ending, <br />all in Auditor's Subdivision Number 217, Hennepin County, <br />Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof: the Northerly <br />line of said Lot 10 is marked by Judicial Landmarks set pursuant <br />to Torrens Case No. 17306, (hereinafter "property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br />variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 to <br />permit the construction of an attached enclosed pool which will en- <br />croach 15' into the average lakeshor.e set ack, and a variance to <br />Section 10.22, Subdivision 2 to allow 39.4% hardcover in the 75-250' <br />lakeshore setback zone where only 25% hardcover is normally allowed. <br />Minnesota: <br />NOW, R'iEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File- #9P7. <br />2. The property is located in the LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District.. <br />3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application or. <br />November 18 and December 16, 1985,.and rc.�commcnded approval of <br />the proposed variances based upon the following findings: <br />A) Applicant has a hardship in that there is no other <br />feasible location for the pool addition. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />