My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-1986 - Agenda Packet City Council - city council (4)
Orono
>
City Council
>
1986
>
01-13-1986 - Agenda Packet City Council - city council (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
12/18/2025 9:53:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
city council
Document Date
1/13/1986
Retention
After
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Other areas considered <br />If you consider the minimum pool size of 16'by '12' or 15'by 35' as <br />proposed with 3' on each side requires a minimum width of 21 feet for <br />just the pool. If you add a seating area for a table and 4 chairs you <br />need another 10'by 10' area. "Sunset Books -Ideas for swimming pools." <br />That brings the minimum width to 31 feet not counting the walls. Neither <br />the North hide or the South side of our lot will accomodate the a minimum <br />Standards. We nave 22 feet from the house to the property line on the <br />South side r.nd 29� feet from the house to the property line on Lae North <br />side. <br />The area on the West side of the house, as you approach in the driveway, <br />is not acceptable because if you build the pool again to minimum standards <br />of 31 feet wide you would have a problem getting the cars out of the garage. <br />You would also destroy the view from our kitchen, Dining room and one Bed- <br />room. The above is also true with a varience to move the pool closer to <br />the property line. Also a pool in that area will directly block off the <br />view from the neighbors house directly to the South. Their kitchen is on <br />that side. <br />The area on the hill behind us is unacceptable because to attach a pool to <br />the house would only be possible at the west end of the garage. That would <br />mean going through two garage areas and a work area to get to the pool. <br />The children are not allowed to play in these areas so it doesn't make <br />sense to go through them to get to the pool. <br />The esthetics of the pool would be lost if it were constructed in that <br />area. <br />The hill area would require the construction of a restroom area. <br />The hill area would re a the removal of a considerable number of trues. <br />Building a {pool not attached to the house defeats the purpose of building <br />an enclosed pool. <br />Conclusion <br />We have considered all possibilities of locating the pool in other are,,s. <br />THE PROPOSED LOCATION IS THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE LOCATION BECAUSE IT IS THE ONLY <br />AREA LARGE ENOUGH TO CONSTRUCT A POOL TO MINIMUM PRACTICAL REOUIRF.MENTS <br />WITHOUT ENCROACHING ON THE NFICHBORS OR DESTROYING, THE. NATURAL SETTING OF <br />Tlll; AREA. <br />r- <br />Sincerly <br />ou <br />r <br />h0B AND .LOAN I BATMAN and f am : l v ` <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.