Laserfiche WebLink
1:'186. 3 <br />TO Mayor and City Coun�, i 1 MEETING <br />FROM: Mark Bernhardson, City Administrator <br />J A 27 1986 <br />®ATE: January 17, 1986 <br />SUBJECT: Sections at West Ferndale and Councy=dOF50RON0 <br />The City has been approached by Mr. Henry Kingman, who lives just <br />past the intersection on Ferndale, regarding the design of the <br />intersection allows persons who are heading from east bound 15 to <br />east West terndale to exit at a high rate of speed and continue <br />on 'Jest Ferndale at that high speed. <br />vie have explored options at they relate to an engineering <br />solution to correct the problem and list the following <br />alternatives: <br />- "Square up" the intersection in or,ler to force people <br />to slow down to make the right hand turn instead of <br />having the large radius that currently e+ists. This <br />would be a solution similar in nature to what we raid at <br />Dunwoody and Casco Point Road. <br />- The other solution that may be worth pursuing is that <br />since it is a two leg intersection that perhaps the <br />western leg should be closed off and the eastern leg <br />improved. The obvious disadvantage to such a <br />development is that it would limit persons coming out of <br />the neighborhood as far as a direct access to west. bound <br />County Road 15, howo er such a move would eliminate a <br />lot of traffic sliding through West Ferndale as a <br />convenient route especially for folks that are out <br />sightseeing and make it more of a quiet neighborhood <br />road. An additional advantage is that it would limit <br />the City from having to maintain two sections of street. <br />Jt should be additionally noted that MTC no longer uses <br />West Ferndale so that alteration to the eastern leg <br />would not cause a problem. <br />'tECOMMr:1IDATION - 7t is the :,taff's recommendation that both the <br />aaiov_calternatives be explored, however, preference right now is <br />t,n actually cut r)f f the western leg and make it more of a private <br />residential stree':. <br />Ndd itionally we would recommend that we post for a public hearing <br />for these in the neighborhood for Council meeting on March 10, <br />1986. <br />Should you have any further questions or comments, please feel <br />free to give them to us. (At the present time we have not asked <br />the City Engineer to do any work in this regar,].) <br />PROPOS':R MOTION - Moved by , _;ecr)nAed by , that the City <br />Council instrur-t l staff to ex- .ort! alternatives to improve the <br />situation includin�j appropriate cost estimates and bring these <br />hack f,ar a public hearing on March 10, 1986. Ayes _, Nays _. <br />